It may not be the flashiest investment out there, but timberland has for several decades now served as a pillar of pension funds, endowments, and institutional investing strategies.

Just like the trees it grows, timberland is viewed as a long term, slow-and-steady-wins-the-race investment, and it has a history of bringing stable returns.

This article examines timberland’s historical return profile and explains how timber’s unique characteristics as a natural resource combine to generate those returns.

Contents

Historical Timberland Risk Vs. Return

Due to the natural growth of the forest products, timberland has historically produced income with more consistency than other asset classes such as equities.

Historical returns for direct timber investments have been strong, with the National Council of Real Estate Investment Fiduciaries (NCREIF) claiming annualized total returns of 10.74% for its Timberland Index since the index’s inception in 1987 through the end of 2021.

The bulk of timberland returns have fallen between 2% and 6% per quarter, with an occasional return above this range, and few below. As can be seen from the figure below, a timberland investment has annual return distributions that are peaked and positively skewed, even across major historical market movements.

bar graph showing timber investment returns 1987-2021

Source: NCREIF Timberland Property Index. Data reflects the period 1/1/1987-12/31/2021.

This performance is in comparison to many other asset classes that tend to have wider ranges of returns. Based on NCREIF data from 1991-2020, Timberland Investment Resources reports a standard deviation of 6.9% for timberland, as compared to 15.9% for the S&P 500 over the same time period.

The same report finds a Sharpe ratio of 1.03 for timberland, in comparison to 0.76 for the S&P 500. (With Sharpe ratios, which are a common metric investors use to determine the relative risk of an investment, the higher the better.)

That means that while total returns for the S&P 500 exceed those of timberland by a little, its volatility exceeds timber by a lot. This is why timberland is used as a stabilizing force in many institutional investment portfolios.

It’s also worth noting that timber investments may be tax advantaged. Because they are typically long term investments, subject to meeting the holding period criteria, they will receive long term capital gains tax treatment rather than be taxed at ordinary income rates.

How Timber Investments Generate Returns

Timberland investments generate returns for investors through:

  • cash flow from tree harvests,
  • property resale (capturing the value of the trees plus the underlying land), and
  • potential additional non-timber income, e.g., recreational leases.

Generally, the larger the property, the more regular the income from timber sales becomes because the more trees there are available for selective harvest.

There is also potential for price appreciation through:

  • active management, which can add some operating expense but often serves to meaningfully improve the growth rates, operability, etc. of a forest and
  • real price changes over time due to market forces around wood and land prices.

These factors have the ability to positively impact total investment return.

forest with trees, stumps, and moss

Biological Growth and In-Growth

Trees grow in volume in terms of board feet due to increases in size, but they also grow into higher-value products as a result of this volume.

  • Biological growth is predictable, unidirectional, and independent of economic factors, one reason for historically stable performance of this asset class.
  • Ingrowth, or trees’ growth into higher-value products, increases over the course of a tree’s life cycle.

Purchase Price

The total return on any investment depends heavily on the price you pay initially. The purchase price for a piece of timberland relates to many factors, including where the forest is in its natural growth cycle. Given the long holding periods associated with timberland investing, overpaying can dramatically impact total investment performance.

Professional Management

Timberland is one of a few assets where value can be created through active management. On-the-ground forestry activities, such as tree selection for planting, stand management, or thinning to enhance timber quality, can add material value to any timberland property.

Timber and Land Price Changes

While volatility in timber prices can be considered a risk in timber investing, when examined over the long run, timber prices have trended above inflation. Land prices are far less volatile, tending to change slowly, and can be seen as a buffer against downside volatility.

Is Timber a Good Investment?

To a large extent, a timberland portfolio can be customized to the investor’s goals. Because timber adds value by adding biomass, landowners and timber managers can harvest selectively as trees mature, or buy and hold on appropriate properties for a return on exit.

That’s why localized timber expertise and experienced asset management is particularly key to timberland investment performance. With managers who know how to

  • find a quality timber property within a given region,
  • sustainably manage a forest for health and productivity, and
  • maximize return potential within the local market,

an investor can build a tailored portfolio that takes advantage of timber’s strengths as an asset. If you’re exploring building a portfolio of timberland as well as other types of agricultural land, take a look at our current offerings.

Note: The information above is not intended as investment advice. Data referenced herein is through year end 2021 and is sourced from Ibbotson SBBI and NCREIF, with additional calculations and analysis performed by AcreTrader. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. For additional risk disclosures regarding farmland or timberland investing and the risks of investing on AcreTrader, please see individual farm offering pages as well as our terms and conditions.

Mark
Mark Foley

Director, Timber Acquisitions

Mark Foley has 20 years experience in real asset consultancy, direct investments, and asset management, including seven years with U.S. Trust as SVP acquiring timberland for ultra-high-net-worth-investors. There he oversaw $720M raised for U.S. Trust and Merrill clients. Mark also previously spent four years as Managing Director CIO at Domain Timber Advisors, where he was responsible for strategy development, financial and performance oversight, and portfolio monitoring, as well as eight years as a timber analyst with GMO and Jeremy Grantham in Boston, where he oversaw $2.5B in capital raised and $650M in dispositions on behalf of institutional investors.